Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing · Minnesota

Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort

Brooklyn Center, MN · ~24 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort: 8.1 TCR = 245% of Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort safety composite

Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−32.9

2018→2024

Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort injury rate improved

Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort's TCR fell 32.9 from 32.9 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 32.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=32.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=10.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · Brooklyn Center, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 245% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #56/56
  • PHOTO Biomedical Enterpris…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort averages 8.1 TCR (245% of the Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort TCR series: 2018=32.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=10.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort falls in its industry

741 Inhalators, surgical and medic establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 56 Inhalators, surgical and medic employers in Minnesota.

Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort (24 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort
Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort (24 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort has fewer employees than the Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 10.7 0.0 2 0 0
2021 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 32.9 8.2 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · MN · Brooklyn Center

741 Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 85 employers in Brooklyn Center, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ad-Tech Medical Instrument Corporation 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Health Line International Corporation 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Polymer Conversions, Inc. 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Cottonwood Dairy 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE WPI-Office 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Services - Jackson 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Repairs and Maintenance 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medtronic MECC 1,252 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medtronic MECC North 1,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brooklyn Center Ambulance 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR Topgolf Brooklyn Center 379 FTE
NAT-TCR Denton Plastics, Inc. 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR AZP047 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dan Avila & Sons - Farming 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Institute of Tucson 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE B80 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trinity Surfaces Orlando 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oregon 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grocery Outlet of Anderson 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.