Skilled nursing facilities · New York

Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Syracuse, NY · ~514 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center runs at 280% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center: 18.2 TCR = 280% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center safety composite

Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 34.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center: 4.7 → 34.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 34.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.9× in 2021

Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's TCR rose 29.8 from 4.7 in 2018 to 34.5 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Syracuse, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.2 · 280% of ind

  • DART 34.5 DART
  • RANK #572/616
  • PHOTO Arbor Care Center-Ne…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~514 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arbor Care Center-Neligh (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center averages 18.2 TCR (280% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center TCR series: 2018=4.7 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=29 · 2021=34.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #572 safest of 616 Skilled nursing facilities employers in New York.

Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center (514 employees, TCR 18.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center (514 employees, TCR 18.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 34.5 34.5 12 70 0
2020 29.0 26.9 17 98 0
2019 4.6 4.6 19 0 0
2018 4.7 3.9 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Syracuse

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 436 employers in Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arbor Care Center-Neligh 18.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edisto Post Acute 18.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lodi Nursing and Rehabilitation 18.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richfield Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 18.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE WDF Inc. 514 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rugby Road 514 FTE
STATE-SIZE East 170th Residence 514 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whitestone Construction Corp. 513 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Health 4,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY 3,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center-SJH-NY 2,803 FTE
NAT-TCR Richfield Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 18.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Loyola Marymount Univ-Mrktplac 18.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Mfg Friendship Village Plant 18.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Double J Manufacturing & Repair 18.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp 514 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZIND 514 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martinrea International, Inc. 514 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Eagan 514 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.