Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) · North Dakota

Double J Manufacturing & Repair

Jud, ND · ~20 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Double J Manufacturing & Repair runs at 627% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) workplace, earning a grade F.

Double J Manufacturing & Repair: 18.2 TCR = 627% of Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Double J Manufacturing & Repair safety composite

Double J Manufacturing & Repair scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−44.3

2016→2022

Double J Manufacturing & Repair injury rate improved

Double J Manufacturing & Repair's TCR fell 44.3 from 58.6 in 2016 to 14.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 70.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=58.6 · 2017=50.9 · 2018=70.8 · 2019=19.2 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=31.5 · 2022=14.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Jud, ND ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.2 · 627% of ind

  • DART 7.1 DART
  • RANK #30/31
  • PHOTO Side X Side Construc…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Side X Side Construction, LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Double J Manufacturing & Repair in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Double J Manufacturing & Repair averages 18.2 TCR (627% of the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Double J Manufacturing & Repair TCR series: 2016=58.6 · 2017=50.9 · 2018=70.8 · 2019=19.2 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=31.5 · 2022=14.3 · BLS 2.9

Where Double J Manufacturing & Repair falls in its industry

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 31 Warehouse construction (e.g., employers in North Dakota.

Double J Manufacturing & Repair (20 employees, TCR 18.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Double J Manufacturing & Repair
Double J Manufacturing & Repair (20 employees, TCR 18.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Double J Manufacturing & Repair has fewer employees than the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 14.3 7.1 2 0 0
2021 31.5 0.0 4 0 0
2020 7.7 3.9 3 1 0
2019 19.2 12.8 3 0 0
2018 70.8 27.2 13 0 0
2017 50.9 21.8 7 0 0
2016 58.6 14.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · ND · Jud

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Side X Side Construction, LLC 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hebert Construction, LLC 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trinity Haven Development, LLC 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robinson Construction, Inc. 18.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Little Knife Office 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE RES 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE BCS - Williston 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Gate & Security 20 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockland Mfg Friendship Village Plant 18.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Richfield Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 18.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 18.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lodi Nursing and Rehabilitation 18.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ashland Mat 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raba Kistner Dallas RKI - Southern Gateway 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson Branch 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Porterville Electric Co., Inc. 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.