Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing · Tennessee

Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc.

Gallatin, TN · ~123 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc. runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc.: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc. safety composite

Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc.: 3.2 → 3.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2023

Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc.'s TCR rose 0.7 from 3.2 in 2022 to 3.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Gallatin, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #38/66
  • PHOTO SPARC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SPARC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc. averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc. TCR series: 2022=3.2 · 2023=3.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc. falls in its industry

2,838 Utility containers (e.g., bask establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 66 Utility containers (e.g., bask employers in Tennessee.

Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc. (123 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc.
Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc. (123 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc. has more employees than the Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.8 1.5 2 3 0
2022 3.2 1.6 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · TN · Gallatin

2,838 Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 100 employers in Gallatin, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SPARC 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KAM Plastics Corp 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR EAM MOSCA Corporation 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR RECTO MOLDED PRODUCTS, INC 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Franklin TN 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACORN ELECTRICAL SPECIALISTS, INC 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tennessee Associated Electric, LLC 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jake Marshall Service Inc 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sumner Regional Medical Center LLC 1,068 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gap Inc. - Central Omni 919 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gap Inc. - Gallatin Tennessee Omni 757 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tennessee Fulfillment Center 735 FTE
NAT-TCR Inmetco 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Recycling 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR RJ Border International 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SM - Salem 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Star Plus Inc 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Employer Training Resource 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Laser Machining 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paddock Printing Center 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.