Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

EAM MOSCA Corporation

Hazle Township, PA · ~213 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EAM MOSCA Corporation runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

EAM MOSCA Corporation: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EAM MOSCA Corporation safety composite

EAM MOSCA Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

EAM MOSCA Corporation injury rate improved

EAM MOSCA Corporation's TCR fell 2.1 from 3.2 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Hazle Township, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #89/183
  • PHOTO KAM Plastics Corp
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 68 inj
  • SIZE ~213 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KAM Plastics Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

EAM MOSCA Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EAM MOSCA Corporation averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EAM MOSCA Corporation TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=4 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where EAM MOSCA Corporation falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 183 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in Pennsylvania.

EAM MOSCA Corporation (213 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate EAM MOSCA Corporation
EAM MOSCA Corporation (213 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

EAM MOSCA Corporation has more employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.4 3 0 0
2023 4.0 2.8 10 0 0
2022 2.8 2.0 7 0 0
2021 3.6 3.1 8 0 0
2020 1.8 0.9 3 1 0
2019 4.5 3.2 10 0 0
2018 6.5 3.7 13 1 0
2017 4.1 3.1 8 0 0
2016 3.2 1.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · PA · Hazle Township

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 36 employers in Hazle Township, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KAM Plastics Corp 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR RECTO MOLDED PRODUCTS, INC 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR IPL USA Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Graduate Plastics Inc. DBA M&M Plastics DBA Quantum Storage Systems 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northeast : Pittsburgh Office 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nello Construction 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Lighting & Signalization LLC 077 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treehouse Private Brands Inc 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hazleton Distribution Center 972 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Hershey Co Hazleton 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9720 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hershey - Hazleton Plant 533 FTE
NAT-TCR John Deere Ottumwa Works 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockford School District Wide 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Ely Lodge 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Omni Barton Creek Resort & Spa 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Team Select Home Care - PHX 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE California Faucets 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbia West Virginia Corporation 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc. 213 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.