Electric power distribution systems · South Carolina

Black River Electric Cooperative

Sumter, SC · ~73 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Black River Electric Cooperative runs at 242% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Black River Electric Cooperative: 2.9 TCR = 242% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Black River Electric Cooperative safety composite

Black River Electric Cooperative scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Black River Electric Cooperative: 3.0 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.47× in 2024

Black River Electric Cooperative's TCR rose 2.7 from 3.0 in 2017 to 5.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Sumter, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.9 · 242% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #67/86
  • PHOTO TEWKSBURY-MA47
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TEWKSBURY-MA47 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Black River Electric Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Black River Electric Cooperative averages 2.9 TCR (242% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Black River Electric Cooperative TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.8 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 1.2

Where Black River Electric Cooperative falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 86 Electric power distribution sy employers in South Carolina.

Black River Electric Cooperative (73 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Black River Electric Cooperative
Black River Electric Cooperative (73 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Black River Electric Cooperative has more employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 4.3 2 2 0
2023 2.7 0.0 0 2 1
2020 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.1 1.6 2 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · SC · Sumter

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 130 employers in Sumter, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TEWKSBURY-MA47 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amarillo Technical Center-122 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palatka Service Center 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN ILLINOIS - Lincoln 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Caraustar Industries, Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Diamond Industries Clinton 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spartanburg Thermoforming - CN3 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE FT4 - Chester 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thompson Construction Group 2,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Tuomey 1,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sumter Utilities, Inc. 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental Tire the Americas LLC - Sumter Plant 1,350 FTE
NAT-TCR San Diego Operations 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Buckeye Forest at Fairfield 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Candela Systems Corporation 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ringneck Energy, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pak Technologies - Good Hope 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Russell Tree Experts Ltd. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Raleigh 1016 Rental Car Rd 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbine Manor Care Center 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.