Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · Pennsylvania

Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda

State College, PA · ~73 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade B.

Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda: 2.0 TCR = 60% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda safety composite

Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda injury rate improved

Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda's TCR fell 0.4 from 3.1 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · State College, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 60% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #29/168
  • PHOTO pozoscantonf, llc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: pozoscantonf, llc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda averages 2.0 TCR (60% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=5 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.4

Where Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 168 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in Pennsylvania.

Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda (73 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda
Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda (73 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Blaise Alexander Hyundai Mazda has more employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 1.3 2 0 0
2023 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2022 2.9 0.0 2 0 0
2021 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 5.0 0.0 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · PA · State College

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 148 employers in State College, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR pozoscantonf, llc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bettenhausen Motor Sales, Inc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DeSoto Mac Haik Ford LTD 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CFLL 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE McMurray Operations 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Philly Schuylkill 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wohlsen Construction Self Perform 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Nittany Medical Center 1,966 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans State College 098 384 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2230 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2230 344 FTE
NAT-TCR Stamford Store II 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Prichard (Branch 1) 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Belstra Milling Company, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Longview Martin Transport 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Waters of Clifty Falls 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE NL 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Clair Nursing Center 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 2 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.