Nonwoven fabrics manufacturing · Maryland

Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting

Salisbury, MD · ~30 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting runs at 160% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nonwoven fabrics manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting: 5.3 TCR = 160% of Nonwoven fabrics manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting safety composite

Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2019→2024

Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting injury rate improved

Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting's TCR fell 3.4 from 6.8 in 2019 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.8 · 2020=8.2 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 313230 · Salisbury, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 160% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO The Brickle Group
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Brickle Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting averages 5.3 TCR (160% of the Nonwoven fabrics manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting TCR series: 2019=6.8 · 2020=8.2 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting falls in its industry

191 Nonwoven fabrics manufacturing establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Nonwoven fabrics manufacturing employers in Maryland.

Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting (30 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting
Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting (30 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Blind Industries - Salisbury Cutting has fewer employees than the Nonwoven fabrics manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2021 10.2 3.4 3 0 0
2020 8.2 0.0 2 0 0
2019 6.8 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

313230 · MD · Salisbury

191 Nonwoven fabrics manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 132 employers in Salisbury, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Brickle Group 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wm. T. Burnett & Co., Nonwovens Division - Statesville 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foss Manufatoring Co LLC (P-3) 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blind Industries - Salisbury Sewing 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wildcat Point Generation Facility 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oliver Homes, Inc. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2016106 - NIST Building 245 Modernization T.O. #1 & 6 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Life Science Products, Inc 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office 637 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salisbury Plant 584 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-PD-SBY-SALISBURY-PD 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Salisbury 430 FTE
NAT-TCR Medical City Fort Worth 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Nisqually Red Wind Casino 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Wenger Corp - OWA 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Manufacturing 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Global Home Improvements Inc 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE H&H Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shin-Etsu Silicones of America, Inc. Evans 2 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Robinson Construction, Inc. 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.