Garbage collection services · Maryland

City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling

Rockville, MD · ~30 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.5
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling runs at 943% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Garbage collection services workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling: 24.5 TCR = 943% of Garbage collection services BLS 2.6 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling safety composite

City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.7

2020→2023

City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling injury rate improved

City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling's TCR fell 16.7 from 37.7 in 2020 to 21.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 61.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=37.7 · 2021=14.8 · 2022=61.8 · 2023=21.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Rockville, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 24.5 · 943% of ind

  • DART 21.0 DART
  • RANK #33/33
  • PHOTO LASAN - Solid Resour…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LASAN - Solid Resources Valley Collection Division West Valley District (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling averages 24.5 TCR (943% of the Garbage collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling TCR series: 2020=37.7 · 2021=14.8 · 2022=61.8 · 2023=21 · BLS 2.6

Where City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling falls in its industry

2,322 Garbage collection services establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 33 Garbage collection services employers in Maryland.

City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling (30 employees, TCR 24.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling
City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling (30 employees, TCR 24.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

City of Rockville Refuse and Recycling has fewer employees than the Garbage collection services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 21.0 21.0 5 0 0
2022 61.8 51.5 12 0 0
2021 14.8 14.8 3 0 0
2020 37.7 33.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · MD · Rockville

2,322 Garbage collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 225 employers in Rockville, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LASAN - Solid Resources Valley Collection Division West Valley District 24.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recology King County 24.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recology of the Coast 24.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walnut Creek Metro 24.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wildcat Point Generation Facility 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oliver Homes, Inc. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2016106 - NIST Building 245 Modernization T.O. #1 & 6 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Life Science Products, Inc 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist Health Shady Grove Medical Center 2,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Medical Center 2,461 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shady Grove Adventist Hospital 2,357 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOM's Organic Market 1,354 FTE
NAT-TCR 056933-Sna-South Main Sta 24.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Braxton and sons 24.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Faulkner Fabricators Inc 24.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 5 Riverbend Dr. Stamford Ct 06907 24.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kroger - Indianapolis in 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Snf Chemical - Riceboro Ga 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 217 - Cascade Store 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 205 - Mt. Pleasant Store 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.