Distribution of electric power · Pennsylvania

BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center

Bloomsburg, PA · ~42 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center runs at 168% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade D.

BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center: 2.0 TCR = 168% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center safety composite

BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center: 0.0 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.93× in 2024

BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center's TCR rose 3.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Bloomsburg, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.0 · 168% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #34/58
  • PHOTO Aurora
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aurora (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center averages 2.0 TCR (168% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 1.2

Where BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 58 Distribution of electric power employers in Pennsylvania.

BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center (42 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center
BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center (42 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

BLMSC Bloomsburg Service Center has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.0 2.5 2 0 0
2018 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · PA · Bloomsburg

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 57 employers in Bloomsburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aurora 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NACOGDOCHES 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kannapolis Operations Center 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marion Operations Center 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Needhams Mushroom Farm 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE KSS Sales 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hy-Tech Mushroom Compost, Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hopewell Organics, LLC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Autoneum Bloomsburg 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kawneer Company, Inc. 429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomsburg Plant 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCB-Bloomsburg 396 FTE
NAT-TCR Precision Walls Inc-Greensboro 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aloha Campus 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Beckley 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dart Container Waxahachie 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tecta Billerica 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE NJ31 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Roseville 39th District Court 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACO Remodeling & Construction, Inc. 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.