Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

Parkside North East

North East, PA · ~42 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Parkside North East runs at 643% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Parkside North East: 24.4 TCR = 643% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Parkside North East safety composite

Parkside North East scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.9

2020→2024

Parkside North East injury rate improved

Parkside North East's TCR fell 7.9 from 24.7 in 2020 to 16.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 45.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=24.7 · 2021=45.0 · 2022=33.5 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=16.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · North East, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 24.4 · 643% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #254/257
  • PHOTO The Arbors at Westfi…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Arbors at Westfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Parkside North East in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Parkside North East averages 24.4 TCR (643% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Parkside North East TCR series: 2020=24.7 · 2021=45 · 2022=33.5 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=16.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Parkside North East falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #254 safest of 257 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Parkside North East (42 employees, TCR 24.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015202530 Average employees Total Case Rate Parkside North East
Parkside North East (42 employees, TCR 24.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Parkside North East has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.8 0.0 3 3 0
2023 2.1 2.1 2 6 0
2022 33.5 30.2 2 8 0
2021 45.0 37.5 1 11 0
2020 24.7 15.4 4 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · North East

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 26 employers in North East, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Arbors at Westfield 24.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pisgah Valley Retirement Center 24.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Park Place 24.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trinity Terrace 24.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Needhams Mushroom Farm 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE KSS Sales 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hy-Tech Mushroom Compost, Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hopewell Organics, LLC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winland Foods Inc 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Valley Foods 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR Welch Foods Inc. North East 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Welch's Food Inc. North East 315 FTE
NAT-TCR Empire Merchants, LLC - Brooklyn 24.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Towneplace Suites by Marriott Milpitas 24.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0601 Westfield 24.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0404 Fort Worth 24.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Phoenix 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alamo Roadway Materials, LLC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inland Truck Parts Company 6 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.