Blood banking · Arizona

Blood Systems, Inc.-Scottsdale

Name: Blood Systems, Inc.-Scottsdale Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Scottsdale, AZ · ~340 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.8
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Blood Systems, Inc.-Scottsdale runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Blood banking workplace, earning a grade A.

Blood Systems, Inc.-Scottsdale: 0.8 TCR = 22% of Blood banking BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Blood Systems, Inc.-Scottsdale safety composite

Blood Systems, Inc.-Scottsdale scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers
DART rate: D 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2017

Blood Systems, Inc.-Scottsdale injury rate improved

Blood Systems, Inc.-Scottsdale's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.1 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2017=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621991 · Scottsdale, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 22% of ind

DART 0.6 DART
RANK #4/54
PHOTO Westland 10226
BOOK 2y book
INJ 6 inj
SIZE ~340 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westland 10226 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Douglas 10190

0.9
Augusta-Peach,

0.9
This site

0.8
Westland 10226

0.8
Tulsa 10014

0.8

What this shows Blood Systems, Inc.-Scottsdale averages 0.8 TCR (22% of the Blood banking BLS benchmark).

Blood Systems, Inc.-Scottsdale TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=0.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Blood Systems, Inc.-Scottsdale falls in its industry

1,713 Blood banking establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 54 Blood banking employers in Arizona.

Blood Systems, Inc.-Scottsdale (340 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Blood Systems, Inc.-Scottsdale has more employees than the Blood banking median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2017	0.6	0.6	2	0	0
2016	1.1	0.3	4	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621991 · AZ · Scottsdale

1,713 Blood banking employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 531 employers in Scottsdale, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Westland 10226	WESTLAND, MI	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Tulsa 10014	TULSA, OK	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Douglas 10190	DOUGLAS, AZ	0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Augusta-Peach, GA BPC	AUGUSTA, GA	0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Water Infrastructure Group	TEMPE	340 FTE
STATE-SIZE	B&F Contracting, Inc.	PHOENIX	340 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.	PRESCOTT	340 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CTI, Inc.	MARANA	340 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Educational Services LLC	Scottsdale	6,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR	City of Scottsdale	Scottsdale	4,077 FTE
CITY-NEAR	SHEA MEDICAL CTR CAMPUS	Scottsdale	2,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR	SUPPORT SERVICES CAMPUS	Scottsdale	2,800 FTE
NAT-TCR	Schneider Electric - Middletown	Middletown, PA	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Oldcastle OPI - Mansfield	Mansfield, TX	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	JFSNA at NALCO Sugarland	Sugarland, TX	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Southaven MS - Reliant 90-17-12-11	Clearwater, FL	0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Provo Center (Utore)	Orem, UT	340 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Menlo Park (Camen)	Menlo Park, CA	340 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Jet.com FC-6923	Mccarran, NV	340 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Amazonas Administration	Jefferson City, MO	340 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.