Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft · North Carolina

Blue Force Technologies

Morrisville, NC · ~52 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Blue Force Technologies runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft workplace, earning a grade F.

Blue Force Technologies: 7.3 TCR = 223% of Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Blue Force Technologies safety composite

Blue Force Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Blue Force Technologies: 3.3 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 12.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.18× in 2020

Blue Force Technologies's TCR rose 0.6 from 3.3 in 2017 to 3.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336411 · Morrisville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 223% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO Precision Heli-Suppo…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Precision Heli-Support, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Blue Force Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Blue Force Technologies averages 7.3 TCR (223% of the Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Blue Force Technologies TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=12.9 · 2020=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Blue Force Technologies falls in its industry

390 Developing and producing proto establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Developing and producing proto employers in North Carolina.

Blue Force Technologies (52 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Blue Force Technologies
Blue Force Technologies (52 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Blue Force Technologies has fewer employees than the Developing and producing prototypes for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.9 1.3 3 0 0
2019 12.9 4.3 7 2 0
2018 9.3 3.7 2 3 0
2017 3.3 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336411 · NC · Morrisville

390 Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 219 employers in Morrisville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Precision Heli-Support, LLC 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Atomics - Poway - A15 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joby Aviation 980 Industrial Rd San Carlos 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oceana, VA 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sutton Energy Complex CC/CT 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Windsor Investments LLC d/b/a Windsor Homes 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilson Covington Construction Company 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Office 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lenovo - Development Drive 2,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC_Morrisville_4200 Paramount Pkwy_ECA42PAR 962 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lenovo - Think Place 794 FTE
CITY-NEAR Teleflex Morrisville 649 FTE
NAT-TCR Horizon Health and Rehabilitation 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Angelus Block - TX 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ace Hardware Retail Support Center (Fredericksburg) 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cyalume Specialty Products 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Food Source 704-Sacramento 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shaw Custodial 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Florock 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shoreline Surgery Center, LLP 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.