Commercial digital printing (except books) · Ohio

Blue Label Packaging Company

Lancaster, OH · ~114 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Blue Label Packaging Company runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial digital printing (except books) workplace, earning a grade A.

Blue Label Packaging Company: 1.0 TCR = 31% of Commercial digital printing (except books) BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Blue Label Packaging Company safety composite

Blue Label Packaging Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2018→2024

Blue Label Packaging Company injury rate improved

Blue Label Packaging Company's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.3 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Lancaster, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/138
  • PHOTO Wentworth Printing
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wentworth Printing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Blue Label Packaging Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Blue Label Packaging Company averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Commercial digital printing (except books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Blue Label Packaging Company TCR series: 2018=4.3 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Blue Label Packaging Company falls in its industry

2,001 Commercial digital printing (e establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 138 Commercial digital printing (e employers in Ohio.

Blue Label Packaging Company (114 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Blue Label Packaging Company
Blue Label Packaging Company (114 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Blue Label Packaging Company has more employees than the Commercial digital printing (except book median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.3 0.0 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · OH · Lancaster

2,001 Commercial digital printing (except books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 96 employers in Lancaster, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wentworth Printing 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midstate Printing Corp 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vomela Specialty Company - 845 Headquarters 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Web Technologies, Inc. 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE AKRON EASTWOOD SHOP 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE EASTERN RANDALL SHOP 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Independence Construction, LLC 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Geiger Bros Mechanical 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairfield Medical Center 2,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anchor Hocking Plant 1 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anchor Hocking 688 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treehouse Foods, Lancaster OH 329 FTE
NAT-TCR SHENANDOAH 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Evonik Calvert City 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Vowell's Marketplace #4 Louisville 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GL Bailey Plumbing Co., Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southwest Galvanizing 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Able Inc. 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Velocity Machine Inc 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Romed, Inc 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.