Concentrates, flavoring (except coffee based), manufacturing · California

Blue Pacific Flavors

City of Industry, CA · ~39 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Blue Pacific Flavors runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Concentrates, flavoring (except coffee based), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Blue Pacific Flavors: 0.8 TCR = 20% of Concentrates, flavoring (except coffee based), manufacturing BLS 4.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Blue Pacific Flavors safety composite

Blue Pacific Flavors scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2022→2024

Blue Pacific Flavors injury rate improved

Blue Pacific Flavors's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311930 · City of Industry, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/10
  • PHOTO DairyChem Laboratori…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DairyChem Laboratories - Fishers (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Blue Pacific Flavors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Blue Pacific Flavors averages 0.8 TCR (20% of the Concentrates, flavoring (except coffee based), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Blue Pacific Flavors TCR series: 2022=2.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.1

Where Blue Pacific Flavors falls in its industry

96 Concentrates, flavoring (excep establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 10 Concentrates, flavoring (excep employers in California.

Blue Pacific Flavors (39 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Blue Pacific Flavors
Blue Pacific Flavors (39 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Blue Pacific Flavors has fewer employees than the Concentrates, flavoring (except coffee b median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311930 · CA · City of Industry

96 Concentrates, flavoring (except coffee based), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 226 employers in City of Industry, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DairyChem Laboratories - Fishers 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kerry - Lakeland 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Citroil Enterprises 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comax Manufacturing Corporation dba Comax Flavors 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE San Felipe Farms 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Brothers Farms 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE TLC Custom Farming Company LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sonoma Valley Vineyards 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morrow-Meadows Corporation 1,879 FTE
CITY-NEAR 050109-INDUSTRY CA P&DC 781 FTE
CITY-NEAR INDUSTRY_1441491 704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kellwood Apparel, LLC 489 FTE
NAT-TCR Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (EO) 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR A-O Painting, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PPI Engineering & Construction Services, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Amcor Specialty Films 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Label-Aid Systems, Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frye Regional Medical Center - FNS 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Statewide Electric & Environmental Solutions, LLC. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Tent LLC 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.