Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Michigan

BMT Aerospace USA, Inc.

Fraser, MI · ~174 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BMT Aerospace USA, Inc. runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

BMT Aerospace USA, Inc.: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BMT Aerospace USA, Inc. safety composite

BMT Aerospace USA, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2022→2023

BMT Aerospace USA, Inc. injury rate improved

BMT Aerospace USA, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.7 from 4.4 in 2022 to 2.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.4 · 2023=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Fraser, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #15/20
  • PHOTO Rolls-Royce: Fortune…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~174 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rolls-Royce: Fortune Circle -SCO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

BMT Aerospace USA, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BMT Aerospace USA, Inc. averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BMT Aerospace USA, Inc. TCR series: 2022=4.4 · 2023=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where BMT Aerospace USA, Inc. falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 20 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Michigan.

BMT Aerospace USA, Inc. (174 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate BMT Aerospace USA, Inc.
BMT Aerospace USA, Inc. (174 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

BMT Aerospace USA, Inc. has more employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.6 2.1 5 0 0
2022 4.4 2.2 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · MI · Fraser

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 40 employers in Fraser, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rolls-Royce: Fortune Circle -SCO 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magellan Aerospace, Haverhill, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TECT Power - Utica 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Component Repair Technologies 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Service Professor GR 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corium Innovations, Inc. 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unistrut International Corporation - Wayne Operation 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brown LLC 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faurecia - Fraser 527 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faurecia Fraser 510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer 145 297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Healthmark Industries Co. 287 FTE
NAT-TCR Colorado Springs CS 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR A&C Business Enterprises 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Valencia Base - Bld: 1030 - 15 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 12624 - Hempfield 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Piston Automotive, LLC 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE R&L Spring Company 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westpac Labs, Inc. Bakersfield 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta West 174 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.