Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · New York

TECT Power - Utica

Whitesboro, NY · ~174 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TECT Power - Utica runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

TECT Power - Utica: 3.6 TCR = 108% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TECT Power - Utica safety composite

TECT Power - Utica scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2019

TECT Power - Utica injury rate improved

TECT Power - Utica's TCR fell 1.6 from 3.9 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Whitesboro, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 108% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #12/13
  • PHOTO Component Repair Tec…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~174 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Component Repair Technologies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

TECT Power - Utica in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TECT Power - Utica averages 3.6 TCR (108% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TECT Power - Utica TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where TECT Power - Utica falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 13 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in New York.

TECT Power - Utica (174 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate TECT Power - Utica
TECT Power - Utica (174 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

TECT Power - Utica has more employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.2 1.1 3 1 0
2018 2.3 0.5 5 0 0
2017 5.8 1.9 10 2 0
2016 3.9 1.6 5 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · NY · Whitesboro

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 12 employers in Whitesboro, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Component Repair Technologies 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolls-Royce: Fortune Circle -SCO 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR GKN Aerospace Chem-tronics 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BMT Aerospace USA, Inc. 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.A. Collins Construction Co., Inc. 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Modern Italian Bakery 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE GREAT NECK SAW MFGRS INC 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buffalo Wire Works 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whitcraft LLC 267 FTE
CITY-NEAR S.R. Sloan, Inc. - Whitesboro, New York 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR S.R. Sloan, Inc. New York 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR H.J. Brandeles Corporation 48 FTE
NAT-TCR 19th #1 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Penn Center Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR North Plainfield, NJ CCIT 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MKE-MILWAUKEE 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Williamsville CUSD #15 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enbridge Energy - East Duluth Office 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunny Grove Landscape 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE GSM Janesville Location 174 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.