Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Louisiana

Bogalusa Container

Bogalusa, LA · ~147 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bogalusa Container runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Bogalusa Container: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bogalusa Container safety composite

Bogalusa Container scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Bogalusa Container held a steady TCR band

Bogalusa Container's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Bogalusa, LA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO Greenville - D060
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greenville - D060 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Bogalusa Container in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bogalusa Container averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bogalusa Container TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Bogalusa Container falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Louisiana.

Bogalusa Container (147 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Bogalusa Container
Bogalusa Container (147 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Bogalusa Container has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.2 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · LA · Bogalusa

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 20 employers in Bogalusa, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greenville - D060 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper - Jackson Container 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Northern Corporation - Twin Cities Fulfillment 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exeter Bulk Container 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zealous Energy Services LLC 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE TIM at Marathon Petroleum Company Catlettsburg KY 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Bend 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1877 LOWE S OF JEFFERSON HIGHWAY LA 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Paper Bogalusa Mill 506 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Paper 501 FTE
CITY-NEAR 803 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 803 223 FTE
NAT-TCR Scott and Reid General Contractors 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific States Environmental Contractors 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Avantic Lodging Enterprises Inc 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE MicroMetl Corporation 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moses Lake 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE HALO Services 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE 46 - Pompano 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.