Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) · Louisiana

Bollinger Amelia Operations

Amelia, LA · ~486 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bollinger Amelia Operations runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) workplace, earning a grade A.

Bollinger Amelia Operations: 1.0 TCR = 30% of Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bollinger Amelia Operations safety composite

Bollinger Amelia Operations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2017→2024

Bollinger Amelia Operations injury rate improved

Bollinger Amelia Operations's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.9 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.9 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336611 · Amelia, LA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #11/53
  • PHOTO Walashek Industrial …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~486 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Walashek Industrial and Marine, Virginia Beach (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Bollinger Amelia Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bollinger Amelia Operations averages 1.0 TCR (30% of the Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bollinger Amelia Operations TCR series: 2017=1.9 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Bollinger Amelia Operations falls in its industry

454 Shipyard (i.e., facility capab establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 53 Shipyard (i.e., facility capab employers in Louisiana.

Bollinger Amelia Operations (486 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bollinger Amelia Operations
Bollinger Amelia Operations (486 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Bollinger Amelia Operations has more employees than the Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of buil median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.4 5 0 0
2023 0.5 0.4 3 1 0
2022 0.8 0.5 8 0 0
2021 1.4 0.5 9 0 0
2020 0.7 0.5 4 0 0
2019 0.6 0.6 3 0 0
2018 1.5 0.8 7 0 0
2017 1.9 0.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336611 · LA · Amelia

454 Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 11 employers in Amelia, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Walashek Industrial and Marine, Virginia Beach 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kingsford Office 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vigor Hawaii 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Apache - Axiall Westlake 486 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Orleans Marriott 486 FTE
STATE-SIZE 911 487 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crosby Tugs, LLC 487 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conrad Deepwater South and Repair 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amelia Belle 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR BOLLINGER MORGAN CITY 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conrad Amelia 87 FTE
NAT-TCR ConCor Networks 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR R.L. McCoy Inc. Columbia City 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR College Station TX Yard 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR InterCon 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Glencoe Regional Health 486 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leegin Creative Leather 486 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caseyville Plant 486 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Augustine 486 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.