Ship repair done in a shipyard · California

Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU

Chula Vista, CA · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Ship repair done in a shipyard workplace, earning a grade A.

Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU: 0.9 TCR = 28% of Ship repair done in a shipyard BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU safety composite

Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2017

Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU injury rate improved

Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU's TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.9 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336611 · Chula Vista, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/52
  • PHOTO Vigor Hawaii
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vigor Hawaii (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Ship repair done in a shipyard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU falls in its industry

454 Ship repair done in a shipyard establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 52 Ship repair done in a shipyard employers in California.

Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU (36 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU
Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU (36 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Siemens Government Technologies- Dresser-Rand CHU has fewer employees than the Ship repair done in a shipyard median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336611 · CA · Chula Vista

454 Ship repair done in a shipyard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 219 employers in Chula Vista, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vigor Hawaii 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Curtiss-Wright Fleet Solutions 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Riviera Beach Campus (1217) 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oceaneering-Marine Services Division 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE River Garden Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knight Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.H. MEEK & SONS INC. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dirt Farmer and Company 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chula Vista Medical Center - 751 Medical Center Court 2,422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sharp Chula Vista Medical Ctr 2,094 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rohr Inc a UTC Aerospace Systems Company 1,957 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rohr, Inc. (Chula Vista CA) 1,457 FTE
NAT-TCR N and R of New Madrid LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Solutions : IS - MFG US - Selmer, TN - Busway 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SMC Electric Joplin 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR TRW Automotive-Marshall 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE C.L. Smith Industrial Company 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pannell Industries, Inc. Dallas-Fort Worth District 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0055 - El Paso, Tx 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 48- Ladd (Cattani) 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.