Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) · Mississippi

Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC

Pascagoula, MS · ~850 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) workplace, earning a grade C.

Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC: 3.0 TCR = 92% of Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC safety composite

Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2022→2024

Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC injury rate improved

Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC's TCR fell 2.3 from 5.2 in 2022 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=5.2 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336611 · Pascagoula, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 92% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #9/19
  • PHOTO Ontonagon Plant
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~850 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ontonagon Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC averages 3.0 TCR (92% of the Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC TCR series: 2022=5.2 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC falls in its industry

454 Shipyard (i.e., facility capab establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 19 Shipyard (i.e., facility capab employers in Mississippi.

Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC (850 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC
Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC (850 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC has more employees than the Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of buil median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 1.1 19 1 0
2023 1.1 0.9 6 0 0
2022 5.2 3.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336611 · MS · Pascagoula

454 Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 59 employers in Pascagoula, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ontonagon Plant 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jamestown Metal Marine Sales, Inc 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vigor Marine - Portland 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Philly Shipyard INC 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Progressive Pipeline Construction, LLC - Company 848 FTE
STATE-SIZE merit health wesley 852 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant 841 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raytheon_Forest_MS 840 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ingalls Shipbuilding 11,345 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pascagoula Refinery 1,566 FTE
CITY-NEAR VT Halter Marine 292 Pascagoula 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chevron Pascagoula Refinery Pascagoula MS 425 FTE
NAT-TCR DCAZ 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mushroom Grower 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Western Specialty Contractors -Minneapolis 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Milton Drop Site 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Van Buren General Office 850 FTE
NAT-SIZE Snyders-Lance, Inc.- Hanover Manufacturing Facility 850 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ulta Beauty WDC 850 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rock Cut Campus 850 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.