Poultry slaughtering, dressing, and packing · Mississippi

Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant

Laurel, MS · ~841 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant runs at 311% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Poultry slaughtering, dressing, and packing workplace, earning a grade F.

Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant: 10.3 TCR = 311% of Poultry slaughtering, dressing, and packing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant safety composite

Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant: 5.8 → 10.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 14.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2024

Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant's TCR rose 4.6 from 5.8 in 2021 to 10.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Laurel, MS ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 311% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #41/41
  • PHOTO Glen Allen Plant
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 265 inj
  • SIZE ~841 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Glen Allen Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant averages 10.3 TCR (311% of the Poultry slaughtering, dressing, and packing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant TCR series: 2021=5.8 · 2022=14.2 · 2023=10.7 · 2024=10.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant falls in its industry

509 Poultry slaughtering, dressing establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 41 Poultry slaughtering, dressing employers in Mississippi.

Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant (841 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant
Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant (841 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant has more employees than the Poultry slaughtering, dressing, and pack median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.4 6.8 75 4 0
2023 10.7 6.9 83 0 0
2022 14.2 12.0 99 0 0
2021 5.8 5.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · MS · Laurel

509 Poultry slaughtering, dressing, and packing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 78 employers in Laurel, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Glen Allen Plant 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilkesboro Fresh Plant 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Holland F/P Plant 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilkesboro Food Service Plant 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Raytheon_Forest_MS 840 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Pipeline Construction, LLC - Company 848 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC 850 FTE
STATE-SIZE merit health wesley 852 FTE
CITY-NEAR Laurel 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howard Industries Inc (Transformer) 2,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Quality Food Service, Inc 1,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing 602 FTE
NAT-TCR Trius, Inc. - Bethlehem PA 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pittsburg Steel, LLC 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rodgers Plumbing & Heating 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Tube and Steel Corporation Kent Branch 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE ETC (Middleton) 841 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kennywood Park 841 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort HealthCare 841 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nascote- Enterprise Ave 841 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.