General freight trucking, local · New York

Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc.

Syracuse, NY · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc. runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General freight trucking, local workplace, earning a grade B.

Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 54% of General freight trucking, local BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc. safety composite

Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2024

Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc. injury rate improved

Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Syracuse, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/85
  • PHOTO 4829-13146
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4829-13146 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (54% of the General freight trucking, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc. falls in its industry

2,784 General freight trucking, loca establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 85 General freight trucking, loca employers in New York.

Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc.
Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Bossong's Commercial Delivery, Inc. has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, local median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2022 8.2 8.2 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 4.7 4.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · NY · Syracuse

2,784 General freight trucking, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 436 employers in Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4829-13146 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR NFI Interactive Logistics LLC-4600 NW 41ST ST 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schnidt Cartage, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR NVLVA - LAS VEGAS 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reeves Farms LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glenview Dairy LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashland Farm LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Porterdale Farms Inc. 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Health 4,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY 3,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center-SJH-NY 2,803 FTE
NAT-TCR The Shepherd Color Company 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Arctic Insulation, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Roanoke 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Berkots 317 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Columbia Cedar - Arden 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kansas City Winnelson 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE R & R Millwork, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE E. H. Schwab Co. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.