Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing · Ohio

Bowerston Plant

Bowerston, OH · ~36 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bowerston Plant runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Bowerston Plant: 2.4 TCR = 71% of Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bowerston Plant safety composite

Bowerston Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2024

Bowerston Plant injury rate improved

Bowerston Plant's TCR fell 5.8 from 5.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327120 · Bowerston, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/48
  • PHOTO Interstate Brick
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Interstate Brick (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Bowerston Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bowerston Plant averages 2.4 TCR (71% of the Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bowerston Plant TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=3 · 2020=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Bowerston Plant falls in its industry

307 Bricks (i.e., common, face, gl establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 48 Bricks (i.e., common, face, gl employers in Ohio.

Bowerston Plant (36 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bowerston Plant
Bowerston Plant (36 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Bowerston Plant has fewer employees than the Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, holl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2016 5.8 2.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327120 · OH · Bowerston

307 Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 5 employers in Bowerston, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Interstate Brick 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ann Sacks 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnesita Refactories Saybrook 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meridian Brick-Stanton-Meridian 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE STEYER SEEDS LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Biosecurity Building 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE BrennCo Inc 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE EAST CREEK FARM LLC 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bowerston, Ohio - L. J. Smith, Inc. 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bowerston OH 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hillstone Bowerston 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bowerston Hills 28 FTE
NAT-TCR Sms 1627 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Interstate Warehousing Franklin 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CP&P Dunn Precast 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Holyoke-1727 Northampton Street 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Franklin 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asbury Power Station 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Continental Refining Company LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tamke Tree Experts, Inc. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.