Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis · Kentucky

Bowling Green Facility

Bowling Green, KY · ~71 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bowling Green Facility runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis workplace, earning a grade D.

Bowling Green Facility: 5.1 TCR = 155% of Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bowling Green Facility safety composite

Bowling Green Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2016→2019

Bowling Green Facility injury rate improved

Bowling Green Facility's TCR fell 4.5 from 7.2 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.2 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Bowling Green, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 155% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #39/44
  • PHOTO Forum Communications…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Forum Communications Printing - Fargo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Bowling Green Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bowling Green Facility averages 5.1 TCR (155% of the Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bowling Green Facility TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Bowling Green Facility falls in its industry

2,001 Labels, commercial printing (e establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 44 Labels, commercial printing (e employers in Kentucky.

Bowling Green Facility (71 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Bowling Green Facility
Bowling Green Facility (71 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Bowling Green Facility has fewer employees than the Labels, commercial printing (except scre median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.7 2.7 1 1 0
2018 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2017 7.9 6.6 6 0 0
2016 7.2 4.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · KY · Bowling Green

2,001 Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 331 employers in Bowling Green, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Forum Communications Printing - Fargo 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intelligencer Printing Co. 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR James Mulligan Printing Company 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FGS WI LLC 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Haase Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE WCA Group, LLC Louisville 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Angliana 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Four Roses Distillery, LLC Cox's Creek 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Kentucky University-Bowling Green 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Medical Center at Bowling Green 1,872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Bowling Green Metalforming 1,441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bowling Green Metalforming 1,344 FTE
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0027 0503 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pap Montgomery 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR TN 2030 E Polymer Dr 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Knoxville - 013 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lacrosse Hardwood Flooring 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Total Company 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE US IL Rockford Plant 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE L.E.C. Inc. 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.