Periodicals commercial printing (except screen) without publishing · Pennsylvania

Intelligencer Printing Co.

Lancaster, PA · ~114 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Intelligencer Printing Co. runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Periodicals commercial printing (except screen) without publishing workplace, earning a grade D.

Intelligencer Printing Co.: 5.1 TCR = 155% of Periodicals commercial printing (except screen) without publishing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Intelligencer Printing Co. safety composite

Intelligencer Printing Co. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.2

2016→2017

Intelligencer Printing Co. injury rate improved

Intelligencer Printing Co.'s TCR fell 10.2 from 10.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.2 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.2 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 155% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #83/110
  • PHOTO Forum Communications…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Forum Communications Printing - Fargo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Intelligencer Printing Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Intelligencer Printing Co. averages 5.1 TCR (155% of the Periodicals commercial printing (except screen) without publishing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Intelligencer Printing Co. TCR series: 2016=10.2 · 2017=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Intelligencer Printing Co. falls in its industry

2,001 Periodicals commercial printin establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 110 Periodicals commercial printin employers in Pennsylvania.

Intelligencer Printing Co. (114 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Intelligencer Printing Co.
Intelligencer Printing Co. (114 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Intelligencer Printing Co. has more employees than the Periodicals commercial printing (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 10.2 2.4 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · PA · Lancaster

2,001 Periodicals commercial printing (except screen) without publishing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Forum Communications Printing - Fargo 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bowling Green Facility 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR James Mulligan Printing Company 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FGS WI LLC 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE TerrAscend-Ilera Health Care 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pittsburgh Operations 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danella Line Services, Inc. 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE PAGODA ELECTRICAL INC 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR Contour Construction 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PA039 - Pauley Construction-Centennial 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland (Mepor) 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR AAA Concrete Products Corp dba Roto Rooter Plumbing 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE CD Lanes 111516 Sundt Construction 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE SG001 - Sage Corporate 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coon Rapids MND5 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milwaukee (Wimlk) 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.