Sheeting, rubber, manufacturing · Michigan

Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan

Grand Rapids, MI · ~143 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Sheeting, rubber, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan: 2.4 TCR = 71% of Sheeting, rubber, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan safety composite

Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan: 0.7 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.37× in 2022

Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan's TCR rose 2.5 from 0.7 in 2018 to 3.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326299 · Grand Rapids, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 71% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO WI Roller - ARCo
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WI Roller - ARCo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan averages 2.4 TCR (71% of the Sheeting, rubber, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan TCR series: 2018=0.7 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=1 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan falls in its industry

257 Sheeting, rubber, manufacturin establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Sheeting, rubber, manufacturin employers in Michigan.

Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan (143 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan
Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan (143 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan has more employees than the Sheeting, rubber, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.2 3.2 5 0 0
2021 3.3 1.9 5 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2019 3.5 3.5 5 0 0
2018 0.7 0.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326299 · MI · Grand Rapids

257 Sheeting, rubber, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WI Roller - ARCo 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Tire Recycling - Godfrey, IL 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stowe Woodward LLC LA (Andritz) 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Datwyler Pharma Packaging USA Inc. 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Niles Industrial Coatings LLC 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hazekamp Meats Inc. 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coveris Battle Creek 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barden Assembly 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR BrandSafway Services, LLC - San Francisco Branch 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Colonial Downs & Rosie's Gaming Emporium 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Save A Lot #80 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas North 33110 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4795-Aa-Fll-Fort Lauderdale-Fll-Trm1 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kingston Rehab of Perrysburg 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4355 Richmond VA Container 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4195 Twin Falls ID 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.