Rolls and roll coverings, rubber (e.g., industrial, papermill, painters', steelmill) manufacturing · Wisconsin

WI Roller - ARCo

Union Grove, WI · ~42 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

WI Roller - ARCo runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Rolls and roll coverings, rubber (e.g., industrial, papermill, painters', steelmill) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

WI Roller - ARCo: 2.4 TCR = 71% of Rolls and roll coverings, rubber (e.g., industrial, papermill, painters', steelmill) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

WI Roller - ARCo safety composite

WI Roller - ARCo scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

WI Roller - ARCo: 0.0 → 7.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.3× in 2024

WI Roller - ARCo's TCR rose 7.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 7.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326299 · Union Grove, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 71% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #3/17
  • PHOTO Boyd Corporation - G…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

WI Roller - ARCo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows WI Roller - ARCo averages 2.4 TCR (71% of the Rolls and roll coverings, rubber (e.g., industrial, papermill, painters', steelmill) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

WI Roller - ARCo TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=3 · 2020=0 · 2021=3 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=7.6 · BLS 3.3

Where WI Roller - ARCo falls in its industry

257 Rolls and roll coverings, rubb establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 17 Rolls and roll coverings, rubb employers in Wisconsin.

WI Roller - ARCo (42 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate WI Roller - ARCo
WI Roller - ARCo (42 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 3.6

WI Roller - ARCo has fewer employees than the Rolls and roll coverings, rubber (e.g., median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.6 3.0 5 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326299 · WI · Union Grove

257 Rolls and roll coverings, rubber (e.g., industrial, papermill, painters', steelmill) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 19 employers in Union Grove, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boyd Corporation - Grand Rapids, Michigan 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Tire Recycling - Godfrey, IL 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stowe Woodward LLC LA (Andritz) 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Datwyler Pharma Packaging USA Inc. 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Port Washington Generating Station 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sterling Water, Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roberts Irrigation Co 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bielinski Homes 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regal Beloit - Union Grove 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grove Gear 199 FTE
CITY-NEAR OAK RIDGE CARE CENTER 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Custom Truck One Source - Union Grove, WI 86 FTE
NAT-TCR ADMINISTRATION 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Corner Market #6067 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Carlex Auburn Glass Plant 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beaumont 3119 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ovation Cabinetry, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alcal Hawaii Roofing 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE English Sewage Disposal, Inc. 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.