Intermediate Care Facilities · District of Columbia

Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc

Washington, DC · ~49 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc runs at 191% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Intermediate Care Facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc: 12.4 TCR = 191% of Intermediate Care Facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc safety composite

Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2020→2021

Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc injury rate improved

Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc's TCR fell 1.1 from 13.0 in 2020 to 11.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=13.0 · 2021=11.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Washington, DC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 12.4 · 191% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO SSMO Maryville Corpo…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SSMO Maryville Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc averages 12.4 TCR (191% of the Intermediate Care Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc TCR series: 2020=13 · 2021=11.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc falls in its industry

15,252 Intermediate Care Facilities establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Intermediate Care Facilities employers in District of Columbia.

Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc (49 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc
Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc (49 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Boys Town Washington D.C., Inc-Dc has fewer employees than the Intermediate Care Facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 11.9 6.8 2 5 0
2020 13.0 3.7 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · DC · Washington

15,252 Intermediate Care Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SSMO Maryville Corporation 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Firesteel SNF Operations 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Shore Care Center 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villa Mesa Care Center 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bardon Inc, DBA Aggregate Industries 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Superior Concrete/DC Plant 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arlington National Cemetery Tours Inc 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Washington, DC Office 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR The DM Burr Group - Southgate Schools 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Village Normal #544 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CFS NorCal - Hayward 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Water Department 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ennis-Flint Ennis North 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Central Group 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henkels & McCoy - Marysville, WA 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ruan Transport Corporation T-063 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.