Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale · California

CFS NorCal - Hayward

Hayward, CA · ~42 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CFS NorCal - Hayward runs at 303% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale workplace, earning a grade F.

CFS NorCal - Hayward: 12.4 TCR = 303% of Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS 4.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CFS NorCal - Hayward safety composite

CFS NorCal - Hayward scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2021

CFS NorCal - Hayward injury rate improved

CFS NorCal - Hayward's TCR fell 0.6 from 13.0 in 2017 to 12.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 113.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.0 · 2018=113.1 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=16.1 · 2021=12.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311991 · Hayward, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.4 · 303% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #52/69
  • PHOTO Market of Choice Cen…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Market of Choice Central Kitchen (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CFS NorCal - Hayward in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CFS NorCal - Hayward averages 12.4 TCR (303% of the Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CFS NorCal - Hayward TCR series: 2017=13 · 2018=113.1 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=16.1 · 2021=12.4 · BLS 4.1

Where CFS NorCal - Hayward falls in its industry

376 Prepared meals, perishable, pa establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 69 Prepared meals, perishable, pa employers in California.

CFS NorCal - Hayward (42 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CFS NorCal - Hayward
CFS NorCal - Hayward (42 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1

CFS NorCal - Hayward has fewer employees than the Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 12.4 8.3 3 0 0
2020 16.1 0.0 2 0 0
2019 8.2 2.7 3 0 0
2018 113.1 84.8 4 0 0
2017 13.0 7.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311991 · CA · Hayward

376 Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 336 employers in Hayward, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Market of Choice Central Kitchen 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR QT Kitchens - Ellenwood 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 890 CENTRAL KITCHEN 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Jackson Kitchen 12.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quad H 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CJJ Farming, Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connell Ranch 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 518 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 100 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 117 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Rose Hospital 929 FTE
NAT-TCR Heartland Ranch Inc. 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Village Normal #544 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Radisson Blu Minneapolis Downtown 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The DM Burr Group - Southgate Schools 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE CDF - 57 Armstrong Location 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village Gate 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE T159 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midstate Reclamation, Inc 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.