Warehouse Testing, Logistics and Repair · Pennsylvania

Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc

Pittston, PA · ~86 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehouse Testing, Logistics and Repair workplace, earning a grade A.

Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc: 0.7 TCR = 12% of Warehouse Testing, Logistics and Repair BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc safety composite

Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2023→2024

Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc injury rate improved

Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=1.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Pittston, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/650
  • PHOTO National Distributio…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: National Distribution Centers LLC-300 PENRY RD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc averages 0.7 TCR (12% of the Warehouse Testing, Logistics and Repair BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc TCR series: 2023=1.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc falls in its industry

9,477 Warehouse Testing, Logistics a establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 650 Warehouse Testing, Logistics a employers in Pennsylvania.

Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc (86 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc
Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc (86 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Br 112 - Communications Test Design Inc has fewer employees than the Warehouse Testing, Logistics and Repair median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · PA · Pittston

9,477 Warehouse Testing, Logistics and Repair employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 96 employers in Pittston, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-300 PENRY RD 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 30239 CAPSTONE - KROGER FOREST PARK GA 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0590 GEODIS LOGISTICS 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diebold Nixdorf North Canton OH GSL 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CT Bartoli Mushrooms, Inc. 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Exelon Power Labs 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Luzerne Service Building 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE 908-NiSource-Canonsburg-SPT PA 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pittston TJ Maxx Distribution Center 1,462 FTE
CITY-NEAR NBC Pittston Merchants, LLC 1,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime, Inc-PA 719 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2807-1449 708 FTE
NAT-TCR Brazos Urethane Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ag-Con, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Columbia 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR DH Pace Company Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ponce Ground Inc 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bird & Cronin LLC 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holden 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smith Creek Inc 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.