Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade · Florida

Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc.

Daytona Beach, FL · ~26 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc. runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc.: 6.0 TCR = 183% of Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc. safety composite

Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.9

2017→2021

Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc. injury rate improved

Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc.'s TCR fell 6.9 from 6.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 19.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.9 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=19.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Daytona Beach, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 183% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P27
  • PHOTO Metal Improvement Co…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Metal Improvement Company- Lynwood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc. averages 6.0 TCR (183% of the Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc. TCR series: 2017=6.9 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=19.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc. falls in its industry

248 Heat treating metals and metal establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc.
Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Braddock Metallurgical-Daytona, Inc. has fewer employees than the Heat treating metals and metal products median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 19.5 7.8 5 0 0
2018 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 6.9 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · FL · Daytona Beach

248 Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 249 employers in Daytona Beach, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Metal Improvement Company- Lynwood 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Improvement Company LLC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accurate Brazing Corporation 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hudapack Metal Treating Inc 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cooperative Producers, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherrylake Inc. - VB 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE HAULING 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE J & J Sugar Harvesters Inc 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Memorial Medical Center 2,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Daytona Beach 2,460 FTE
CITY-NEAR SMA Healthcare, Inc 1,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bethune Cookman University 682 FTE
NAT-TCR Western Veneer & Slicing Company 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aurora CCA 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Galax-Grayson EMS 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Darling Ingredients Inc. Sioux City 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Demco Manufacturing Inc 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bennys Car Wash - Essen 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alta Bates Summit Medical Center (213-OK-001) 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.