Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel · Minnesota

Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt

Minneapolis, MN · ~26 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade B.

Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt: 2.6 TCR = 79% of Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt safety composite

Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.8

2019→2021

Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt injury rate improved

Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt's TCR fell 7.8 from 7.8 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=7.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Nucor Tubular Products
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nucor Tubular Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt averages 2.6 TCR (79% of the Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt TCR series: 2019=7.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt falls in its industry

329 Tubing, mechanical and hypoder establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Tubing, mechanical and hypoder employers in Minnesota.

Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt (26 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt
Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt (26 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Metal-Matic, Inc.- Humboldt has fewer employees than the Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.8 7.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · MN · Minneapolis

329 Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nucor Tubular Products 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MaiCo Industries, Inc 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lally Pipe & Tube - KY 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR cemtec 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Becker 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverstreak Dairy LLC, Silverstreak Dairy 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms Huiras MN 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden Egg 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR CBOC Columbus 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlotte, NC Office 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR School District of Phillips 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Americold Piedmont, SC 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stevenson Community Center 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE John Hedges Admin Building 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ridgeland Common 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rehm 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.