Almond hulling and shelling · California

Braden Hulling

Denair, CA · ~8 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Braden Hulling runs at 301% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Almond hulling and shelling workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.6
avg TCR · per 100 workers
4.5
industry benchmark (BLS)
3
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Braden Hulling's OSHA Total Case Rate of 13.6 to the Almond hulling and shelling BLS benchmark of 4.5 (301% of benchmark) across 3 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Braden Hulling's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 4.5 industry benchmark.

-1001020304050 201720182019 04.5 Industry benchmarkBraden Hulling TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 115114.

Where Braden Hulling falls in its industry

737 Almond hulling and shelling establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #236 safest of 248 Almond hulling and shelling employers in California.

Trend analysis for Braden Hulling

Between 2017 and 2019, Braden Hulling's Total Case Rate improved from 40.7 to 0.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 100% decrease across 2 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 40.7, a spread of 40.7 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 3 reporting years, Braden Hulling recorded 3 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 3-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 3 injuries shown on this page for Braden Hulling are sourced from its own 3 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 115114 - Almond hulling and shelling.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2019)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 1,900 hours worked = 0.00 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Braden Hulling (this establishment) 13.56 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg
Almond hulling and shelling industry avg 4.50 BLS IIF, NAICS 115114
California state avg (all industries) 5.64 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Braden Hulling to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 40.7 13.6 3 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Braden Hulling's reported OSHA injury record versus its Almond hulling and shelling peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 301% of the Almond hulling and shelling benchmark, Braden Hulling reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Almond hulling and shelling sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Braden Hulling's safety grade?
Braden Hulling has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 13.6 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 4.5 for Almond hulling and shelling.
How many injuries has Braden Hulling reported?
Braden Hulling has reported 3 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 3 years of OSHA data (2019, 2018, 2017). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within California, and by nearby establishments in Denair - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Similar TCR (~13.6)

Similar size (~8 workers)

Nearby in Denair

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.