Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Virginia

Brandywine Living @Alexandria

Alexandria, VA · ~95 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
25.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brandywine Living @Alexandria runs at 660% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brandywine Living @Alexandria: 25.1 TCR = 660% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brandywine Living @Alexandria safety composite

Brandywine Living @Alexandria scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 25.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 47.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brandywine Living @Alexandria: 2.8 → 47.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 47.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.89× in 2021

Brandywine Living @Alexandria's TCR rose 44.6 from 2.8 in 2019 to 47.4 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Alexandria, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 25.1 · 660% of ind

  • DART 47.4 DART
  • RANK #197/199
  • PHOTO Auberge at Orchard P…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Auberge at Orchard Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Brandywine Living @Alexandria in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brandywine Living @Alexandria averages 25.1 TCR (660% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brandywine Living @Alexandria TCR series: 2019=2.8 · 2021=47.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Brandywine Living @Alexandria falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #197 safest of 199 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Virginia.

Brandywine Living @Alexandria (95 employees, TCR 25.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Brandywine Living @Alexandria
Brandywine Living @Alexandria (95 employees, TCR 25.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brandywine Living @Alexandria has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 47.4 47.4 3 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Alexandria

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 335 employers in Alexandria, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Auberge at Orchard Park 25.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR RPH-East Memory Care Residences at Creekstone 25.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atria Evergreen Valley 25.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosewood Park Assisted Living 25.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE REC - Bowling Green 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Virginia Division Office 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE DC - Clune Construction Company 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jamerson Lewis Construction 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria Rail Facility/Telegraph Road 1,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inova Alexandria Hospital 1,512 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria Rail Yard 996 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inova Mount Vernon Hospital 950 FTE
NAT-TCR Dallas Vending 25.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Marshfield Care Center 25.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1002-Ucpmc-Armory B - Tradewinds 25.1 TCR
NAT-TCR empirical foods, inc. - Lexington 25.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE HCOL 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edison Public Schools 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Erie Cty Med Center 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Two Rivers Middle Magnet School 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.