Outpatient treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals) for substance abuse (i.e., alcoholism, drug addiction) · Illinois

Breaking Free Inc.

Aurora, IL · ~56 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Breaking Free Inc. runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Outpatient treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals) for substance abuse (i.e., alcoholism, drug addiction) workplace, earning a grade B.

Breaking Free Inc.: 2.3 TCR = 61% of Outpatient treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals) for substance abuse (i.e., alcoholism, drug addiction) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Breaking Free Inc. safety composite

Breaking Free Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2017

Breaking Free Inc. injury rate improved

Breaking Free Inc.'s TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.6 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621420 · Aurora, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/16
  • PHOTO Renewal - 700
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Renewal - 700 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Breaking Free Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Breaking Free Inc. averages 2.3 TCR (61% of the Outpatient treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals) for substance abuse (i.e., alcoholism, drug addiction) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Breaking Free Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Breaking Free Inc. falls in its industry

611 Outpatient treatment centers a establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 16 Outpatient treatment centers a employers in Illinois.

Breaking Free Inc. (56 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Breaking Free Inc.
Breaking Free Inc. (56 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Breaking Free Inc. has fewer employees than the Outpatient treatment centers and clinics median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.6 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621420 · IL · Aurora

611 Outpatient treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals) for substance abuse (i.e., alcoholism, drug addiction) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 325 employers in Aurora, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Renewal - 700 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 22nd Street 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dayton 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 701 Wall Street 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bulk Power Operations 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norris Electric Cooperative 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 73G - Northern S - IL Gas Ops 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schaumburg Reporting Center 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indian Prairie School District 204 3,309 FTE
CITY-NEAR Factor Aurora 2,167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rush Copley Medical Center, Inc. 2,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR ANDY FRAIN SERVICES INC 2,100 FTE
NAT-TCR Benchmark-Worthington 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Grid Solutions : AIS - USC - Charleroi, PA, USA 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4627 Colorado Spring 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mercy Inpatient Meical Associates (MIMA) 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maryland Parkway 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE ADS Buena Vista 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 44974 - Carolina Service Center 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross store 1799 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.