Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · District of Columbia

Brentwood Rail Facility

Washington, DC · ~314 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brentwood Rail Facility runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade B.

Brentwood Rail Facility: 3.5 TCR = 77% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brentwood Rail Facility safety composite

Brentwood Rail Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2022

Brentwood Rail Facility injury rate improved

Brentwood Rail Facility's TCR fell 1.5 from 4.1 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2017=5.0 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Washington, DC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #3/8
  • PHOTO Keolis Pompano
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 64 inj
  • SIZE ~314 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Keolis Pompano (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

Brentwood Rail Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brentwood Rail Facility averages 3.5 TCR (77% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brentwood Rail Facility TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=5 · 2018=4 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=2.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Brentwood Rail Facility falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 8 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in District of Columbia.

Brentwood Rail Facility (314 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Brentwood Rail Facility
Brentwood Rail Facility (314 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Brentwood Rail Facility has more employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.6 2.6 5 3 0
2021 3.4 3.4 6 3 0
2020 2.1 1.7 6 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 11 0 0
2018 4.0 3.7 13 3 0
2017 5.0 3.9 14 0 0
2016 4.1 3.4 9 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · DC · Washington

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Keolis Pompano 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Gate, CA - 5650 Southern 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parks Avenue 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenbelt Rail Yard 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pro Air Inc. 314 FTE
STATE-SIZE RAI CREW DCA 311 FTE
STATE-SIZE 58841 WALDORF ASTORIA WASHINGTON DC 317 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5941 318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Enterprist Holdings - CLT Airport 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR J&M Steel Solutions 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR PTM of Attleboro 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Twin Express, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Phillips-Medisize, LLC - St. Croix Meadows 314 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHI-ODFL 314 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buckingham Mfg. Co. Inc. 314 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tech Data Groveport 314 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.