Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Maryland

Greenbelt Rail Yard

College Park, MD · ~854 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenbelt Rail Yard runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade B.

Greenbelt Rail Yard: 3.4 TCR = 76% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenbelt Rail Yard safety composite

Greenbelt Rail Yard scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2018→2022

Greenbelt Rail Yard injury rate improved

Greenbelt Rail Yard's TCR fell 1.4 from 4.0 in 2018 to 2.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.0 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · College Park, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.4 · 76% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #8/20
  • PHOTO MV Transportation Di…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 104 inj
  • SIZE ~854 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MV Transportation Division 105 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Greenbelt Rail Yard in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenbelt Rail Yard averages 3.4 TCR (76% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenbelt Rail Yard TCR series: 2018=4 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=2.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Greenbelt Rail Yard falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 20 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in Maryland.

Greenbelt Rail Yard (854 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenbelt Rail Yard
Greenbelt Rail Yard (854 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Greenbelt Rail Yard has more employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.6 2.5 13 8 0
2021 4.5 4.5 19 16 0
2020 2.4 2.4 13 6 0
2019 3.7 3.4 30 3 0
2018 4.0 3.6 29 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · MD · College Park

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 22 employers in College Park, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MV Transportation Division 105 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbus, OH - Williams Dr 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keolis Pompano 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brentwood Rail Facility 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rite Aid Distribution 855 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baltimore BWI 860 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arinc Incoporated (Annapolis MD) 860 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABERDEEN PLANT 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6000 GREENBELT RAIL FACILITY 771 FTE
CITY-NEAR IKEA #411 College Park 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR TK Elevator Washington DC 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2366 SHOPPERS-COLLEGE PARK (SV 05205 107 FTE
NAT-TCR YMCA Camp Chingachgook 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Alpha Control LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0817 Case Farms - Goldsboro (Kill) 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1212 - Canton-GA 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rockaway Home Care 854 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCO - Inflight 854 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pfizer Vega Baja 854 FTE
NAT-SIZE Continental Battery Company 854 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.