Skilled nursing facilities · North Carolina

Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock

Charlotte, NC · ~66 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock: 5.2 TCR = 80% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock safety composite

Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2018

Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock injury rate improved

Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock's TCR fell 1.2 from 5.6 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.6 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.2 · 80% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #211/510
  • PHOTO Hunter's Creek Nursi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hunter's Creek Nursing and Rehab Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock averages 5.2 TCR (80% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock TCR series: 2016=5.6 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=4.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #211 safest of 510 Skilled nursing facilities employers in North Carolina.

Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock (66 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock
Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock (66 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Brian Center Nursing Care/Shamrock has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.3 2.2 2 0 0
2017 5.7 0.0 3 0 0
2016 5.6 1.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Charlotte

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hunter's Creek Nursing and Rehab Center 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR JAG Healthcare Marion 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR View Park Convalescent Hospital 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life Care Center of Michigan City 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clinton Field Services 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riverbend Steam Station 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salisbury Operations Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASHEVILLE OPERATIONS 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Anthony Timberlands - Beirne 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR LA Water Service/UI of LA Covington Office 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Supervalu Distribution Center - Quincy 38081 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 500 ABC Supply Co., inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Moly-Cop USA 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cenveo Hurlock 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashland Health and Rehabilitation Center 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norris Sales Company Inc. 1 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.