Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham

Hingham, MA · ~78 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham runs at 225% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham: 8.6 TCR = 225% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham safety composite

Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−20.8

2018→2024

Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham injury rate improved

Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham's TCR fell 20.8 from 22.0 in 2018 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 22.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=22.0 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=12.2 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Hingham, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 225% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #113/210
  • PHOTO CSL Summit Place LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CSL Summit Place LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham averages 8.6 TCR (225% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham TCR series: 2018=22 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=12.2 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #113 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham (78 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham
Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham (78 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.2 7.2 3 0 0
2021 12.2 4.9 5 0 0
2020 8.7 2.2 3 1 0
2018 22.0 2.2 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Hingham

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 41 employers in Hingham, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CSL Summit Place LLC 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10055 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Alta Loma 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Mariana Butte 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Freetown Cultivation Facility 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Walpole 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE UFP Site Built, LLC 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corderman & Company Inc. 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Linden Ponds 774 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hingham Manufacturing 318 FTE
CITY-NEAR McDonald Electrical Corp 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Russelectric, A Siemens Business 247 FTE
NAT-TCR 1263 PYP Sun Valley 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR TXH014 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SCC002 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 8025 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE BJ Cecil Trucking Inc 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE PFA Systems inc 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus OH 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Mechanical Services of Houston, LLC 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.