Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

The Waters of Oakdale

Oakdale, MN · ~51 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Waters of Oakdale runs at 225% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Waters of Oakdale: 8.6 TCR = 225% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Waters of Oakdale safety composite

The Waters of Oakdale scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.1

2016→2023

The Waters of Oakdale injury rate improved

The Waters of Oakdale's TCR fell 18.1 from 26.2 in 2016 to 8.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 26.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=26.2 · 2017=0.2 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2022=9.4 · 2023=8.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Oakdale, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 225% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #149/240
  • PHOTO Bridges by EPOCH at …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

The Waters of Oakdale in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Waters of Oakdale averages 8.6 TCR (225% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Waters of Oakdale TCR series: 2016=26.2 · 2017=0.2 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=0 · 2022=9.4 · 2023=8.1 · BLS 3.8

Where The Waters of Oakdale falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #149 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

The Waters of Oakdale (51 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Waters of Oakdale
The Waters of Oakdale (51 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Waters of Oakdale has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.1 2.7 3 0 0
2022 9.4 9.4 4 0 0
2021 - - 0 0 0
2020 - - 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.2 0.2 11 0 0
2016 26.2 23.0 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Oakdale

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 74 employers in Oakdale, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bridges by EPOCH at Hingham 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSL Summit Place LLC 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10055 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Alta Loma 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Union Dairy LLP 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE ON 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wes Hanson Builders 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis Office 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mulcahy Nickolaus LLC 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakdale - Main Store 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR 11762 Oakdale 231 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOAK - Oakdale Manufacturing 208 FTE
NAT-TCR Mechanovent Corporation / The New York Blower Company 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Doncasters Storms Forge 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Les Schwab Transport-Prineville 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Mariana Butte 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ryerson - Wilmington 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lanham MD 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark Energy Cooperative 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mar-Jac Poultry, Inc Feed Mill 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.