Cord for reinforcing rubber tires, industrial belting, and fuel cells manufacturing · Tennessee

Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc.

Clarksville, TN · ~472 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc. runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cord for reinforcing rubber tires, industrial belting, and fuel cells manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc.: 5.0 TCR = 150% of Cord for reinforcing rubber tires, industrial belting, and fuel cells manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc. safety composite

Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2018→2024

Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc. injury rate improved

Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.3 from 6.5 in 2018 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.5 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 314994 · Clarksville, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 150% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK P35
  • PHOTO Innovative Textiles,…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 135 inj
  • SIZE ~472 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Innovative Textiles, Inc. (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc. averages 5.0 TCR (150% of the Cord for reinforcing rubber tires, industrial belting, and fuel cells manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc. TCR series: 2018=6.5 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc. falls in its industry

31 Cord for reinforcing rubber ti establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc. (472 employees, TCR 5.0) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 110 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 24 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc.
Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc. (472 employees, TCR 5.0) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 110 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Bridgestone Metalpha USA, Inc. has more employees than the Cord for reinforcing rubber tires, indus median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 2.8 22 0 0
2023 2.9 1.9 23 0 0
2022 4.6 3.1 19 3 0
2021 5.3 4.4 21 3 0
2020 6.4 4.6 22 3 0
2018 6.5 5.4 28 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

314994 · TN · Clarksville

31 Cord for reinforcing rubber tires, industrial belting, and fuel cells manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 213 employers in Clarksville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Innovative Textiles, Inc. 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ashaway line & twine 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AIKEN MFG., INC. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Cordage East, LTD 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Indian Path Community Hospital 472 FTE
STATE-SIZE IAC, Dayton LLC 471 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nashville 473 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knoxville Assembly 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR Commercial HVAC Americas : MFG-Clarksville, TN-USA 1,713 FTE
CITY-NEAR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : MFG-Clarksville, TN-USA 1,701 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clarksville Holdings, LLC d/b/a Gateway Medical Center 1,134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Montgomery County Government 1,029 FTE
NAT-TCR Norfolk Sheraton 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Greensboro Embassy Suites 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bell Flavors and Fragrances 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Earl Smith Distributing Company 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE SSFP 472 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cascade Engineering 472 FTE
NAT-SIZE Habasit America 472 FTE
NAT-SIZE 666 Tul1000 472 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.