Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · Michigan

Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit

Detroit, MI · ~126 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit: 3.1 TCR = 150% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit safety composite

Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit: 1.3 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.69× in 2018

Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit's TCR rose 1.6 from 1.3 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Detroit, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.1 · 150% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #64/114
  • PHOTO C118 Lavergne ROC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C118 Lavergne ROC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit averages 3.1 TCR (150% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=5.2 · 2018=2.9 · BLS 2.1

Where Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 114 Industrial equipment and machi employers in Michigan.

Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit (126 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit
Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit (126 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Bridgewater Interiors - Detroit has more employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.9 2.2 3 1 0
2017 5.2 5.2 3 0 0
2016 1.3 1.3 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MI · Detroit

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 673 employers in Detroit, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C118 Lavergne ROC 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hussmann Services Corporation - Denver 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPATCO Energy Solutions, LLC - Raleigh Branch 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMC-Chatt 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Allied Power Services - DTE, Fermi Station 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE PK Contracting, LLC. Troy 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michigan 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pontiac Ceiling & Partition, LLC 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit Campus 8,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - DTW 6,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Corporation 5,241 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Vestal East 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Scottsdale Links Resort 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Republic National Distributing Company 2 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Zimowski Food Specialties 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cerro Fabricated Products LLC 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ambassador Manor Nursing Center 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Steel Services, Inc. 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Patriot Ridge Community 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.