General warehousing and storage · Alabama

Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center

Auburn, AL · ~40 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center: 2.3 TCR = 40% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center safety composite

Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center: 0.0 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 4.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2020

Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center's TCR rose 4.7 from 0.0 in 2019 to 4.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Auburn, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.3 · 40% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #37/102
  • PHOTO Rinchem Company - CS…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rinchem Company - CSC 16 Hillsboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center averages 2.3 TCR (40% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=4.7 · BLS 5.8

Where Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 102 General warehousing and storag employers in Alabama.

Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center (40 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center
Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center (40 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Briggs and Stratton Global Distribution Center has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · AL · Auburn

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 113 employers in Auburn, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rinchem Company - CSC 16 Hillsboro 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Dominguez 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prime Now LLC - UNY1 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Branch 5555 - WP Park North Bl 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plant Central Alabama - APC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jasper Office 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeast Division Eufaula State Docks Complex 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consolidated Construction Co. of Ala. 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Briggs & Stratton 602 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4021-000017263 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR 000017263 AUBURN UNIVERSITY DINING 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 356 344 FTE
NAT-TCR Insteel Wire Products - St. Joseph, MO 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunrise Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ALS Twin Maples 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Good Printers, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 24JY-Enterprise Holdings-EWR (Enterprise) 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Noltex Truss DFW, Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE 028 Minneapolis 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Safety Marking of New York Inc. 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.