Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Massachusetts

Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital

Name: Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Boston, MA · ~1,659 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 7.7
Avg TCR: 7.5
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade C.

Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital: 7.7 TCR = 102% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital safety composite

Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 7.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers
DART rate: F 4.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital: 7.3 → 8.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2021

Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital's TCR rose 0.7 from 7.3 in 2020 to 8.0 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Boston, MA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 7.7 · 102% of ind

DART 4.5 DART
RANK #73/87
PHOTO MN,Worthington-Medic…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 162 inj
SIZE ~1,659 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MN,Worthington-Medical Center-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

This site

7.7
MN,Worthington

7.7
OSF HMMC

7.7
041 Texas Heal

7.7
Sutter Amador

7.7

What this shows Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital averages 7.7 TCR (102% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital TCR series: 2020=7.3 · 2021=8 · BLS 7.5

Where Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 87 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Massachusetts.

Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital (1,659 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital has more employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2021	8.0	4.5	86	4	0
2020	7.3	3.6	76	8	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MA · Boston

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 577 employers in Boston, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	MN,Worthington-Medical Center-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals	WORTHINGTON, MN	7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	OSF HMMC	URBANA, IL	7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	041 Texas Health Specialty Hospital Fort Worth	FORT WORTH, TX	7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Sutter Amador Hospital (110-7001)	JACKSON, CA	7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Beverly Hospital	BEVERLY	1,653 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital	JAMAICA PLAIN	1,651 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston	CHARLESTOWN	1,637 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Consigli Construction Company, Inc.	MILFORD	1,686 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Massachusetts General Hospital	Boston	26,855 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Brigham and Women's Hospital	Boston	19,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Brigham and Womens Hospital	Boston	19,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Brigham & Women's Hospital	Boston	18,260 FTE
NAT-TCR	Parker Adventist Hospital	Parker, CO	7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living	Canoga Park, CA	7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Osco Incorporated	Rochester Hills, MI	7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Kayline Processing	Trenton, NJ	7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	EatStreet	Madison, WI	1,659 FTE
NAT-SIZE	DENSO Manufacturing Athens Tennessee, INC	Athens, TN	1,659 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Osceola Regional Medical Center	Kissimmee, FL	1,660 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Great Western Bank	Sioux Falls, SD	1,658 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.