Water control and quality program administration · Connecticut

Bristol Water Department

Bristol, CT · ~38 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bristol Water Department runs at 760% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water control and quality program administration workplace, earning a grade F.

Bristol Water Department: 24.3 TCR = 760% of Water control and quality program administration BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bristol Water Department safety composite

Bristol Water Department scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bristol Water Department: 27.3 → 58.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 66.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2021

Bristol Water Department's TCR rose 31.4 from 27.3 in 2016 to 58.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 66.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924110 · Bristol, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 24.3 · 760% of ind

  • DART 23.5 DART
  • RANK #14/15
  • PHOTO WCC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WCC (1.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Bristol Water Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bristol Water Department averages 24.3 TCR (760% of the Water control and quality program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bristol Water Department TCR series: 2016=27.3 · 2017=26.8 · 2018=22.6 · 2019=20.6 · 2020=66.9 · 2021=58.8 · BLS 3.2

Where Bristol Water Department falls in its industry

131 Water control and quality prog establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 15 Water control and quality prog employers in Connecticut.

Bristol Water Department (38 employees, TCR 24.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Bristol Water Department
Bristol Water Department (38 employees, TCR 24.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Bristol Water Department has fewer employees than the Water control and quality program admini median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 58.8 23.5 15 0 0
2020 66.9 46.0 8 8 0
2019 20.6 20.6 5 0 0
2018 22.6 22.6 4 2 0
2017 26.8 15.3 5 2 0
2016 27.3 19.5 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924110 · CT · Bristol

131 Water control and quality program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 95 employers in Bristol, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WCC 25.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Genoa - Public Works Department 26.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PWD SANITATION 27.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PWD WPC 21.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Massirio Dr 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE JP Maguire Associates, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaRosa Construction Co., Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 104839 - 66.7MW Quinebaug Solar 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR ESPN Bristol Campus 3,688 FTE
CITY-NEAR ESPN Headquarters 3,607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bristol Public Schoold 1,432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bristol Hospital 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR Bear Creek Senior Living 24.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kingsburg Healing Center 24.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-01897 24.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mer-Mobile Enterprise Resources RF&IP LLC 24.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lakeside Industries, Inc. (110) 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE RideRight - Tracy CA 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE FedEx Office Print Service 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edwards Manufacturing Company 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.