Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing · Illinois

Broadcast Electronics

Quincy, IL · ~50 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Broadcast Electronics runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Broadcast Electronics: 2.0 TCR = 59% of Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Broadcast Electronics safety composite

Broadcast Electronics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2018

Broadcast Electronics injury rate improved

Broadcast Electronics's TCR fell 1.5 from 3.7 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334220 · Quincy, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 59% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #10/11
  • PHOTO Electronics Research…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Electronics Research, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Broadcast Electronics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Broadcast Electronics averages 2.0 TCR (59% of the Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Broadcast Electronics TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Broadcast Electronics falls in its industry

247 Broadcast equipment (including establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 11 Broadcast equipment (including employers in Illinois.

Broadcast Electronics (50 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Broadcast Electronics
Broadcast Electronics (50 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Broadcast Electronics has fewer employees than the Broadcast equipment (including studio), median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.7 3.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334220 · IL · Quincy

247 Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 155 employers in Quincy, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Electronics Research, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NJ31 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winegard Company 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Continental Electronics Corporation 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Champaign CMI1 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1240-Monmouth, IL 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Constellation Nuclear Services & Training Center (STC) 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Gas Storage 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blessing Corporate Services Inc 2,993 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Knapheide Manufacturing Company 1,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blessing Business Center 514 FTE
CITY-NEAR John Wood Community College 380 FTE
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #735 (Aitkin, MN) 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Arkansas Motors Inc DBA Honda of Jonesboro 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Field Sales Central 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Classic Graphics, LLC - Morrisville 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sunoco Transportation SES 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE MPC Cashway Lumber Company 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkway Products Cobb Georgia 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marion Tin Can Plant 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.