Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing · Texas

Continental Electronics Corporation

Dallas, TX · ~116 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Continental Electronics Corporation runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Continental Electronics Corporation: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Continental Electronics Corporation safety composite

Continental Electronics Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2017→2024

Continental Electronics Corporation injury rate improved

Continental Electronics Corporation's TCR fell 1.9 from 2.9 in 2017 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 990.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.9 · 2018=990.1 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334220 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #23/27
  • PHOTO NJ31
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NJ31 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Continental Electronics Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Continental Electronics Corporation averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Continental Electronics Corporation TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=990.1 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Continental Electronics Corporation falls in its industry

247 Broadcast equipment (including establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 27 Broadcast equipment (including employers in Texas.

Continental Electronics Corporation (116 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Continental Electronics Corporation
Continental Electronics Corporation (116 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Continental Electronics Corporation has more employees than the Broadcast equipment (including studio), median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2018 990.1 660.1 3 0 0
2017 2.9 1.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334220 · TX · Dallas

247 Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NJ31 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winegard Company 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Telemetrics, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Broadcast Electronics 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 103173 - GE-USLNG Trains-1-5 Pad Assembly 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bandera Electric Cooperative 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE NACOGDOCHES 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Houston Non-GBU Office 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Bridgeport,WV 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1321 Hin54 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Electrical Systems Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Viking Plastics 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sunflower Paving, Inc 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE RMH Foods LLC 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Office 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Redeemer Health and Rehab 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.