Crop driers manufacturing · Indiana

Brock Grain Conditioning

Frankfort, IN · ~65 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brock Grain Conditioning runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Crop driers manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Brock Grain Conditioning: 4.7 TCR = 142% of Crop driers manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brock Grain Conditioning safety composite

Brock Grain Conditioning scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2024

Brock Grain Conditioning injury rate improved

Brock Grain Conditioning's TCR fell 4.7 from 7.9 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.9 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=9.6 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333111 · Frankfort, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 142% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO Great Plains Manufac…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Great Plains Manufacturing Inc - HR & Special Projects SA3 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Brock Grain Conditioning in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brock Grain Conditioning averages 4.7 TCR (142% of the Crop driers manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brock Grain Conditioning TCR series: 2016=7.9 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=9.6 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Brock Grain Conditioning falls in its industry

433 Crop driers manufacturing establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Crop driers manufacturing employers in Indiana.

Brock Grain Conditioning (65 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Brock Grain Conditioning
Brock Grain Conditioning (65 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Brock Grain Conditioning has fewer employees than the Crop driers manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 2.2 3 0 0
2023 5.8 1.5 4 0 0
2022 3.3 1.7 2 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.8 5.8 4 0 0
2018 9.6 8.2 7 0 0
2017 4.4 1.5 2 1 0
2016 7.9 3.2 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333111 · IN · Frankfort

433 Crop driers manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 47 employers in Frankfort, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Great Plains Manufacturing Inc - HR & Special Projects SA3 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverview Manufacturing Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hammer Haag Steel Inc 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AGCO Corporation - Beloit, Kansas 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE FTWN NE Svc Ctr 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Runnebohm Construction Company Inc 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELECOM PLACEMENT INC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE COMBDRIN-IndyEast 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR FRANKFORT EAST PLANT 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR NHK Seating of America 822 FTE
CITY-NEAR FRANKFORT CORE 632 FTE
CITY-NEAR FRANKFORT EAST 614 FTE
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 080 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR King George Plant 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1001 - BELFOR Livonia MI 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Zero Zone, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Fresh Market 196 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fresh Market 208 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fresh Market 212 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fresh Market 181 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.