Homes with or without health care, intellectual and developmental disability · Nebraska

Broken Bow

Broken Bow, NE · ~22 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Broken Bow runs at 324% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes with or without health care, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

Broken Bow: 12.3 TCR = 324% of Homes with or without health care, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Broken Bow safety composite

Broken Bow scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−45.0

2016→2024

Broken Bow injury rate improved

Broken Bow's TCR fell 45.0 from 65.0 in 2016 to 20.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 65.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=65.0 · 2017=20.0 · 2018=20.0 · 2019=17.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=10.0 · 2023=11.4 · 2024=20.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Broken Bow, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 324% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/21
  • PHOTO Village North
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Village North (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Broken Bow in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Broken Bow averages 12.3 TCR (324% of the Homes with or without health care, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Broken Bow TCR series: 2016=65 · 2017=20 · 2018=20 · 2019=17.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=10 · 2023=11.4 · 2024=20 · BLS 3.8

Where Broken Bow falls in its industry

2,261 Homes with or without health c establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 21 Homes with or without health c employers in Nebraska.

Broken Bow (22 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Broken Bow
Broken Bow (22 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Broken Bow has fewer employees than the Homes with or without health care, intel median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 20.0 0.0 2 0 0
2023 11.4 11.4 2 0 0
2022 10.0 10.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 17.1 11.4 3 0 0
2018 20.0 20.0 4 0 0
2017 20.0 20.0 4 0 0
2016 65.0 10.0 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · NE · Broken Bow

2,261 Homes with or without health care, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 13 employers in Broken Bow, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Village North 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niagara St ICF 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Progressive Residential Services of Michigan 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tammy Lynn Center, Inc. 12.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Raikes Farm 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE JSMM Farms Spalding 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MPM Dairy West LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mt Echo 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Becton Dickinson 561 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Lot 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Melham Medical Center 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookestone View 85 FTE
NAT-TCR Valley Waste Service, Inc. 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Madison County EMS 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Creasy Springs Health Campus 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0741 Cary 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE L'Anse Manufacturing, Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corning Sow Farm 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Psp Industries/Monotech of Mississippi 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE HCC-INDIANAPOLIS 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.